首页> 外文OA文献 >Short review: Is bull-kelp kelp? The role of common names in science
【2h】

Short review: Is bull-kelp kelp? The role of common names in science

机译:简短评论:海带是海带吗?俗名在科学中的作用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Common names are non-specific by definition, and scientists should naturally avoid placing strict rules on their usage. There are many examples of common names applying to numerous, often only distantly related taxa, yet the term 'kelp' is increasingly being used to refer solely to members of the macroalgal order Laminariales, and some scientists now assert that any other use is incorrect. A brief examination of the word's etymology, however, demonstrates that kelp can with equal validity also refer to non-laminarialean taxa. Many people do still use the word 'kelp' in its broader sense, and these conflicting definitions of the word can lead to confusion and miscommunication between scientists and the general public. This review demonstrates that the definition of 'kelp' should remain relaxed, in accordance with its role as a common name. © 2012 The Royal Society of New Zealand.
机译:通用名称从定义上讲是非特定的,科学家自然应该避免对其用法设定严格的规则。有许多通用名称的示例适用于众多(通常仅是远距离相关的)分类单元,但是“海带”一词越来越多地被用来指代大型藻类海带的成员,一些科学家现在断言任何其他用法都是不正确的。对该词的词源进行简短检查,即可发现海带同样可以指非拉米那利分类群。许多人仍然从广义上使用“海带”一词,这些对词的定义冲突会导致科学家与公众之间的混淆和误解。这篇评论表明,根据海带的通用名称,“海带”的定义应保持宽松。 ©2012新西兰皇家学会。

著录项

  • 作者

    Fraser, Ceridwen;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2012
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号